Entrepreneurial judgment governance adaptation for digital transformation in established firms

Abstract

Research Summary: We contend that entrepreneurial judgment governance (EJG) is a profound yet poorly understood process in which firms sense, seize, and transform opportunities related to digital transformation. Grounded in a rich, multi-case study of six large incumbent firms, we conceptualize and examine how firms change EJG through three phases: recognizing, distributing, and orchestrating. We find that EJG adaptation is at the heart of why some firms succeed in responding to the challenges associated with digital transformation while others fail. Implications and opportunities for future research are discussed.

Managerial Summary: Entrepreneurial judgment governance (EJG) is central to explaining why some firms succeed in digital transformation (DT) whereas others do not. EJG determines who has the right to exercise entrepreneurial judgment (EJ) about allocating and using resources to address new opportunities. As distinct types of uncertainties require distinct EJ features, established firms face the challenge of EJG adaptation to the unique DT uncertainties. Based on a multiple-case study, we offer a three-stage framework that facilitates and expedites EJG adaptation to DT. Furthermore, our study highlights that strategic leaders who fail to comprehend the need for changes in EJG, neglect to establish an EJG architecture aligned with DT goals, or overlook implementing necessary adjustments internally and externally, may hinder positive DT outcomes.

 

Article Authorship:

    1. Leonardo Gomes  School of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP), Sao Paulo, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3913-4770
    2. Alejandra Flechas School of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP), Sao Paulo, Brazil
    3. Ana Lucia Figueiredo Facin Department of Production Engineering, Campus Sao Paulo, Paulista University (UNIP), Sao Paulo, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0379-4574
    4. Felipe Mendes Borini School of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP), Sao Paulo, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1389-136X
    5. Bruno Stefani
      CESAR School, Recife, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0841-1512
    6. Lorenna Fernandes Leal
      Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil